Archive for ‘Law’

August 7, 2012

Obama’s College Classmate: ‘The Obama Scandal Is at Columbia’

Advice to Romney:Release Your Tax Returns Only After Obama Releases his Transcripts and Health Records.

I am President Obama’s classmate at Columbia University, Class of ’83. I am also one of the most accurate Las Vegas oddsmakers and prognosticators. Accurate enough that I was awarded my own star on the Las Vegas Walk of Stars. And I smell something rotten in Denmark. Obama has a big skeleton in his closet. It’s his college records. Call it “gut instinct” but my gut is almost always right. Obama has a secret hidden at Columbia- and it’s a bad one that threatens to bring down his presidency. Gut instinct is how I’ve made my living for 29 years since graduating Columbia.

Obama and his infamous strategist David Axelrod understand how to play political hardball, the best it’s ever been played. Team Obama has decided to distract America’s voters by condemning Mitt Romney for not releasing enough years of his tax returns. It’s the perfect cover. Obama knows the best defense is a bold offense. Just keep attacking Mitt and blaming him for secrecy and evasion, while accusing him of having a scandal that doesn’t exist. Then ask followers like Senator Harry Reid to chase the lead. The U.S. Senate Majority Leader appears to now be making up stories out of thin air, about tax returns he knows nothing about. It’s a cynical, brilliant, and vicious strategy. Make Romney defend, so he can’t attack the real Obama scandal.

This is classic Axelrod. Obama has won several elections in his career by slandering his opponents and leaking sealed documents. Not only do these insinuations and leaks ruin the credibility and reputation of Obama’s opponents, they keep them on the defensive and off Obama’s trail of sealed documents.

By attacking Romney’s tax records, Obama’s socialist cabal creates a problem that doesn’t exist. Is the U.S. Senate Majority Leader making up stories out of thin air? You decide. But the reason for this baseless attack is clear- make Romney defend, so not only is he “off message” but it helps the media ignore the real Obama scandal.

My answer for Romney? Call Obama’s bluff.

Romney should call a press conference and issue a challenge in front of the nation. He should agree to release more of his tax returns, only if Obama unseals his college records. Simple and straight-forward. Mitt should ask “What could possibly be so embarrassing in your college records from 29 years ago that you are afraid to let America’s voters see? If it’s THAT bad, maybe it’s something the voters ought to see.” Suddenly the tables are turned. Now Obama is on the defensive.

My bet is that Obama will never unseal his records because they contain information that could destroy his chances for re-election. Once this challenge is made public, my prediction is you’ll never hear about Mitt’s tax returns ever again.

Why are the college records, of a 51-year-old President of the United States, so important to keep secret? I think I know the answer.

If anyone should have questions about Obama’s record at Columbia University, it’s me. We both graduated (according to Obama) Columbia University, Class of ’83. We were both (according to Obama) Pre-Law and Political Science majors. And I thought I knew most everyone at Columbia. I certainly thought I’d heard of all of my fellow Political Science majors. But not Obama (or as he was known then- Barry Soetoro). I never met him. Never saw him. Never even heard of him. And none of the classmates that I knew at Columbia have ever met him, saw him, or heard of him.

But don’t take my word for it. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2008 that Fox News randomly called 400 of our Columbia classmates and never found one who had ever met Obama.

Now all of this mystery could be easily and instantly dismissed if Obama released his Columbia transcripts to the media. But even after serving as President for 3 1/2 years he refuses to unseal his college records. Shouldn’t the media be as relentless in pursuit of Obama’s records as Romney’s? Shouldn’t they be digging into Obama’s past–beyond what he has written about himself–with the same boundless enthusiasm as Mitt’s?

The first question I’d ask is, if you had great grades, why would you seal your records? So let’s assume Obama got poor grades. Why not release the records? He’s president of the free world, for gosh sakes. He’s commander-in-chief of the U.S. military. Who’d care about some poor grades from three decades ago, right? So then what’s the problem? Doesn’t that make the media suspicious? Something doesn’t add up.

Secondly, if he had poor grades at Occidental, how did he get admitted to an Ivy League university in the first place? And if his grades at Columbia were awful, how’d he ever get into Harvard Law School? So again those grades must have been great, right? So why spend millions to keep them sealed?

Third, how did Obama pay for all these fancy schools without coming from a wealthy background? If he had student loans or scholarships, would he not have to maintain good grades?

I can only think of one answer that would explain this mystery.

Here’s my gut belief: Obama got a leg up by being admitted to both Occidental and Columbia as a foreign exchange student. He was raised as a young boy in Indonesia. But did his mother ever change him back to a U.S. citizen? When he returned to live with his grandparents in Hawaii or as he neared college-age preparing to apply to schools, did he ever change his citizenship back? I’m betting not.

If you could unseal Obama’s Columbia University records I believe you’d find that:

A)   He rarely ever attended class.

B)   His grades were not those typical of what we understand it takes to get into Harvard Law School.

C)   He attended Columbia as a foreign exchange student.

D)   He paid little for either undergraduate college or Harvard Law School because of foreign aid and scholarships given to a poor foreign students like this kid Barry Soetoro from Indonesia.

If you think I’m “fishing” then prove me wrong. Open up your records Mr. President. What are you afraid of?

If it’s okay for U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to go on a fishing expedition about Romney’s taxes (even though he knows absolutely nothing about them nor will release his own), then I think I can do the same thing. But as Obama’s Columbia Class of ’83 classmate, at least I have more standing to make educated guesses.

It’s time for Mitt to go on the attack and call Obama’s bluff.

Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee and the author of “The Conscience of a Libertarian.” Read more at his website: www.ROOTforAmerica.com

via Root: Obama’s College Classmate: ‘The Obama Scandal Is at Columbia’ | TheBlaze.com.

Advertisements
August 2, 2012

The Qualifying Factor In The Civil Rights Legacy and the American Chattel Slave

Ted Hayes, Voice of the American Descendants of Chattel Slaves

Ted Hayes: I Am Purging The Term Black From My Vocabulary

In a profound disrespect that tramples upon the U.S. Constitution, the following ‘illicit proponents’ of illegal immigration, particularly that of the fabricated, radical, neo “Brown-Bronze” La Raza Hispanic/Latino populations; the Islamic Jihad-Muslim incursion; those of the Sodomite or homosexual-lesbian and transgender movements, and Barack Hussein Obama and his socialist agenda masters, are usurping the sacred benefits and special protections of the Civil Rights laws legislated by Congress specifically for the American Chattel Slaves and their descendants.

In special notice to the La Raza radicals, who hatefully mock the American Chattel Slaves and their descendants; this message is for you.

EXPERIENCE: The Primary Factor

All these perverse claims to Civil Rights benefits are rebellious to the Constitution because Congress did not grant them based on skin-color, i.e., racial characteristics, cultural ethnicities, minority/majority status, sexual preference, nor religious beliefs, but rather their unique EXPERIENCED entry into the United States as the primary factor.

Too often, these ‘illicit proponents’ use our U.S. Civil Rights as a tool to cover their selfish “American Dreaming” and/or a means by which to change the very fundamental foundations of the United States into something that is more like European socialism, the Biblical Sodom and Gomorrah, or an Arab-Islamic Religious-Sharia Caliphate.

As a result of these ‘illicit proponents’ use of the Civil Rights laws, meant for the freed Chattel Slaves and their descendants, I am purging out from my vocabulary the term “black” and “minority” as the description or identity of the Hametic peoples of Africa (of which I am) within the United States of America.

Descendants of Chattel Slaves

While a bit lengthy, I am opting for the term of “Descendants of Chattel Slaves” (DOCS) which identifies a people based not on race, but rather a unique EXPERIENCE that sets them apart from all other ethno-racial nationalities, classes and status (minority-majority) within the United States.  See “Meaning of Chattel Slaves” [HERE]

After chattel slavery in the United States was abolished, the Radical Republican Congress codified into the US Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which is the progenitor of the 14th Amendment that granted federal (not individual States which came later in 1964) citizenship to the freed slaves and their children’s descendants.

By claiming the benefits and equal protection laws of the Constitutional Civil Rights Act of 1866, these ‘illicit proponents’ shout that the dominate ‘White’ Americans, are treating them like Blacks were treated, which in so many ways is an blatant, mocking lie.  All those who support, embrace and promulgate this disgusting policy will eventually be shamed to derision for it.

Of course, this accusation cowers the intimidated, guilt-ridden White American Liberals, and unfortunately too many ‘un-convicted’ conservative Patriots, even certain “African-Americans” into submission to the agendas of the enemies of free peoples and domestic rebels against the Constitution.

The Fatal Flaw of the Usurpers

Thanks to GOD, because Annuit Septis (“HE Has Favored Our Undertaking”), in that, herein lays the fatal flaw in the usurpers disrespect for the DOCS as well as their cruel, selfish, destructive, bastardization of the Civil Rights benefits, despite whatever tragic sufferings and struggles they endure, these usurpers nevertheless have no grounds or STANDING to legitimately equate theirs “experience” with those of the DOCS.  See “STANDING” [HERE]

In fact, to do so, is not only constitutionally forbidden, but is also a contemptible, racist and deliberately malicious act, with hateful, spiteful and evil intent against the American Chattel Slaves whose skin color and racial characteristics happen to be “black”.

To remove all doubt, the beneficiaries of the Civil Rights Legacy are specifically for those Americans who EXPERIENCED the lineage of being brought into the United States via the Transatlantic Slave Trade, i.e., the exiled Africans who became Chattel Slaves, as well as their descendants being “Jim Crowed” into another form of ownership.

Whereas, all other ethno-racial-nationalities or minorities do not have that unique American experience, but rather, one of a “willing” immigration or/and sexual preference, thereby evidently demonstrating theirs as ineligible to be equated with that of the  descendants of the Chattel Slaves.

The Differences

All ethno-racial-nationalities, including certain minorities came to America as “willing” immigrants on the metaphoric, “Mayflower”, particularly those of the early British colonial times, whereas, the Chattel Slaves arrived as “unwilling” immigrants on the metaphoric British-American Slave Ships, “The Good Ship Jesus” commissioned in 1562 by Queen Elizabeth and the “Desire,” which later sailing out of Salem, Massachusetts, in 1638.  The two experiences are not and cannot be equated! Read more: [HERE]

With this knowledge, people who have earned the right to be called an American Citizens can now as righteous, but humble Patriots, confidently stand against all these ‘proponents’ of foreign enemy invasions who have the mitigated gall to usurp our American Civil Rights as a shield to destroy our country.

Along with turning these invasions around, the victorious Patriots must, by the authority of citizens arrest laws, also begin to identify, apprehend and prosecute all federal, state, county and municipal government officials, who have sworn the oath of office in the Name of GOD, to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, but instead have deliberately acted contrary to and willfully rebelled against it. See “GOD In The Declaration of Independence” [HERE]

In summation, EXPERIENCE, not race, minority/majority status, sexual preference, nor religion, is the qualification for Civil Rights benefits, which is why I am purging the term “Black” from my vocabulary, in order to end the abuse against the highest law of our beloved land.

TED HAYES

February 7, 2012

Catholics are ready to do battle with Obama Over 1st Amendment Infraction. Re-election at risk.

Obama Almighty

Catholic leaders upped the ante Monday, threatening to challenge the Obama administration over a provision of the new health care law that would require all employers, including religious institutions, to pay for birth control.

As CBS 2’s Marcia Kramer reports, it could affect the presidential elections.

Catholic leaders are furious and determined to harness the voting power of the nation’s 70 million Catholic voters to stop a provision of President Barack Obama’s new heath car reform bill that will force Catholic schools, hospitals and charities to buy birth control pills, abortion-producing drugs and sterilization coverage for their employees.

“Never before, unprecedented in American history, for the federal government to line up against the Roman Catholic Church,” said Catholic League head Bill Donohue.

Already Archbishop Timothy Dolan has spoken out against the law and priests around the country have mobilized, reading letters  from the pulpit. Donohue said Catholic officials will stop at nothing to put a stop to it.

“This is going to be fought out with lawsuits, with court decisions, and, dare I say it, maybe even in the streets,” Donohue said.

But pro-choice groups said they will fight the church and fight for the right of employees of Catholic institutions to have birth control and other services paid for.

via Catholic League Poised To Go To War With Obama Over Mandatory Birth Control Payments « CBS New York.

November 1, 2011

Guide To Sexual Harassment – Rules, Patterns, Legalese

The “hostile environment” standard is the more vague of the two. The EEOC notes, however, that there must be a pattern. Isolated incidents usually cannot constitute sexual harassment. (RELATED: Cain confirms ‘false accusations’ of sexual harassment)

“Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted),” the EEOC explains.

Center for Equal Opportunity president Roger Clegg explained that asking someone out on a date once and being turned down would not be considered sexual harassment. But continued, unwanted sexual behavior could lead to a hostile work environment.

“Asking somebody out for a date and the person says ‘no’ and that is the end of it would not be sexual harassment. On the other hand if you are repeatedly making lewd remarks and physical contact that is a violation of the law,” he told TheDC, noting, “There is a subjective element in it and it depends on the extent to which the person is on notice: If the action doesn’t seem to be that unreasonable to the perpetrator, but he is told repeatedly to stop doing it, that would be a problem. But there needs to be a pattern.”

via Guide To Sexual Harassment | Rules, Patterns, Legalese | The Daily Caller.

%d bloggers like this: